While majority of the petitions have been filed by particular person farmers, many of the PILs have been filed by Amaravati Parirakshana Samiti and different farmers’ associations in Amaravati. These associations have moved the excessive courtroom with a contemporary petition or by an interim software each time the state authorities has taken a choice with regard to the capital.
The farmers’ associations have challenged the federal government for not finishing growth work in Amaravati even earlier than the federal government introduced its plans for decentralisation. They have challenged the federal government’s name for objections to the professional committee report as properly. More than 5 petitions have been filed for inviting objections to the professional committee report with out revealing the identical and never specifying the context of the notices.
Further, the state authorities’s proposal to present home websites in Amaravati to the landless poor from Vijayawada, Guntur and different locations and the choice to shift vigilance fee and commissionerate of enquiries have additionally been challenged by farmers. Farmers have managed to get interim reduction in these issues because the excessive courtroom has stayed the shifting of places of work and in addition put aside the federal government orders on land allotment.
The farmers have additionally opposed the proposed adjustments to the grasp plan to incorporate a brand new zone within the Amaravati grasp plan to facilitate land allotment for housing. Relying on the promissory estoppel and the doctrine of authentic expectations, the farmers have moved numerous petitions searching for completion of works as per the Amaravati grasp plan and have sought compensation for the delay in completion of trunk infrastructure work.
While the state authorities is agency on the three-capital method, farmers in addition to different litigants are agency on exploring all authorized choices. The excessive courtroom has taken up the listening to of all these petitions collectively. With all litigants very specific about their viewpoint, a marathon listening to is predicted with prime advocates locking horns.