“If you (DU) are so squeaky clear, then why are you feeling so threatened? Why are you taking it personally? The committee would solely be trying into grievances of the scholars,” the courtroom mentioned throughout the listening to of the college’s attraction towards the August 7 order of a single choose.
The varsity contended that the reconstituting of its GRC displays poorly on its status and that of the committee’s earlier members.
It urged the bench to permit it to carry out its capabilities with none outdoors interference or another person coming in to do its job.
The varsity additionally instructed that the sooner 4 member committee be retained and it may be headed by a retired excessive courtroom choose.
However, the bench declined to simply accept the suggestion.
It, as a substitute, instructed another — that one of many dropped members might be made a part of the reconstituted GRC turning it right into a six-member physique with the chairperson, who shall be a retired HC choose, having the casting vote — which was accepted by DU.
Thereafter, the bench included professor S C Rai, who was earlier dropped from the GRC, because the sixth member of the committee and directed that will probably be useful from Friday.
The courtroom mentioned numbers of all of the members of the committee be furnished to the chairperson and directed that the GRC will assemble nearly for its assembly on August 17 or as directed by the chairperson.
Only to this extent, the bench modified the August 7 order of the only choose who had reconstituted the GRC as a five-member physique headed by a HC choose.
The bench, in its order, additionally clarified that reconstitution of the GRC neither impinges on the integrity of the appellant-university nor does it intrude on its authority.
“In reality, deciding on members of the committee who aren’t part of the University, however have ample expertise at hand, would solely add to its stature and endorse the impartiality of the method extra so when it’s headed by a retired choose of the High Court,” the courtroom mentioned.
It additionally mentioned that the aforesaid order has been handed “solely to allay the apprehensions of the appellant-university that any aspersion has been solid on its integrity merely as a result of the only choose reconstituted the committee.
“The whole objective of including exterior members to the committee seems to be to make it impartial and pellucid, which may hardly be faulted,” the bench mentioned whereas disposing of the attraction by the varsity.
Meanwhile, in associated proceedings earlier than the only choose on an software by the GRC, claiming that the varsity was not cooperating with its functioning, DU officers assured Justice Prathiba M Singh that the committee could be functioning as per her order of August 7.
In view of the peace of mind given by DU, Justice Singh disposed of the applying moved by GRC.
The August 7 order had come on a plea by Anupam and others difficult the college’s choice to carry on-line Open Book Examination (OBE), as per the UGC pointers, for ultimate yr undergraduate programs.
The exams commenced from August 10 and are scheduled to go on until August 31.
The college students who shall be ignored of on-line OBE shall be given a possibility to look in bodily examinations, to be held someday in September, DU had informed the courtroom earlier.
The single choose had additionally reconstituted the five-member grievance redressal committee beneath the aegis of retired Justice Prathiba Rani for coping with all of the grievances of scholars and had mentioned that the panel will perform until OBE continues and the scholars’ complaints have to be addressed inside 5 days.